Skip to main content

Distributed Architecture: From Routers to AI Data Center Supernodes

·659 words·4 mins
Network Architecture Distributed Systems AI Data Center Routing Ethernet
Table of Contents

🧱 Networking Planes: The Foundation of Distribution
#

Modern network devices are logically divided into three planes:

  • Management Plane — configuration, monitoring, and lifecycle operations
  • Control Plane — topology discovery, routing computation, and policy decisions
  • Forwarding Plane (Data Plane) — real-time packet processing and transmission

As networking evolved from simple packet delivery to AI-scale data movement, the forwarding plane underwent the most dramatic transformation—shifting from centralized to deeply distributed architectures.


🔄 Centralized vs. Distributed Forwarding Models
#

At the heart of any router are two core data structures:

  • RIB (Routing Information Base) — built by protocols such as BGP or OSPF
  • FIB (Forwarding Information Base) — a hardware-friendly projection of the RIB used for packet forwarding

Centralized Forwarding
#

In early router designs:

  • A single FIB resides on the main control board
  • Line cards forward packets by querying the central processor
  • Throughput scales poorly as all traffic converges on one bottleneck

This model quickly collapses under high bandwidth and low-latency demands.

Distributed Forwarding
#

Modern high-performance routers instead:

  • Replicate the FIB across all line cards
  • Allow each card to independently forward packets
  • Eliminate the central forwarding bottleneck

This architectural shift is the first major step toward scalability.


🧩 Cell-Based Distributed Forwarding: The Broadcom DNX Model
#

As port speeds increased, even distributed packet forwarding became insufficient. The next evolution was cell-based internal switching, exemplified by the Broadcom DNX / Jericho family.

Internal Pipeline
#

  1. Ingress Processing
    • Packet parsing
    • Lookup and classification
  2. Cellization
    • Variable-length Ethernet frames sliced into fixed-size cells
  3. Switch Fabric Transit
    • Cells traverse the fabric via Ramon fabric chips
  4. Egress Processing
    • Cells reassembled
    • Headers rewritten (MAC, VLAN, MPLS, etc.)

This design decouples external packet formats from internal transport, enabling extreme bandwidth scaling.

Credit-Based Flow Control
#

To prevent fabric congestion:

  • Egress cards advertise available buffer credits
  • Ingress cards must request permission before sending cells
  • If the destination is congested, traffic is buffered upstream

This lossless, backpressure-driven model becomes critical for AI workloads later.


🧠 Distributed Control Planes and Data Center Networking
#

The same distribution principles expanded beyond routers into entire data centers.

SDN and Control Separation
#

  • OpenFlow / SDN centralized the control plane on x86 servers
  • Physical switches retained fast, distributed forwarding logic
  • Enabled global policy with local execution

IP Clos (Spine–Leaf) Topologies
#

Modern Ethernet data centers rely on Clos fabrics:

  • Leaf switches connect to servers
  • Spine switches provide non-blocking interconnect
  • Routing decisions are decentralized

If a link or spine fails, local rerouting happens immediately, ensuring resilience without centralized intervention.


🧠 AI Data Centers: The Network as a Supernode
#

AI workloads demand lossless, deterministic Ethernet to keep GPUs and XPUs fully utilized. Architects generally face two approaches:

  • Single-Chassis Systems
    • Tight control
    • Limited scale
  • Spine–Leaf IP Clos
    • Virtually unlimited scale
    • Requires advanced congestion control (ECN, PFC, DCQCN)

Jericho3-AI: Router Principles at Data Center Scale
#

Broadcom’s Jericho3-AI extends modular router design across the entire fabric:

  • Leaf switches: Jericho-class chips
  • Spine fabric: Ramon chips
  • The data center behaves like a giant distributed chassis

From the GPU’s perspective, thousands of switches collapse into a single logical forwarding plane—a true network-level supernode.


🚀 The Next Frontier: Ultra Ethernet (UE)
#

Looking beyond 2026, Ultra Ethernet (UE) targets clusters with up to 1 million XPUs. The key innovation is extending scheduling and reliability from the network core all the way to endpoints.

Core enabling technologies include:

  • NSCC / RCCC
    • Fine-grained, end-to-end congestion control
  • LLR (Link-Level Retry)
    • Reliability enforced at the physical link layer
  • CBFC (Credit-Based Flow Control)
    • Cell-level backpressure extended across the full fabric

The result is a network where loss avoidance, not loss recovery, is the default behavior.


🧭 Conclusion: Distribution as the Only Scalable Path
#

From classic routers to AI supernodes, one lesson repeats:

Centralized architectures inevitably hit performance walls.

By distributing:

  • forwarding logic
  • control intelligence
  • congestion management

modern networks escape those limits. AI data centers are not a break from networking history—they are its logical conclusion: the entire fabric operating as one massively distributed computer.

Related

ByteDance Unveils 102.4T AI Switch and HPN 6.0 to Power 100K-GPU Clusters
·600 words·3 mins
AI Infrastructure Data Center Networking Ethernet Hyperscalers ByteDance
IFEC Explained: Memory-Semantic Acceleration Over Ethernet Scale-Up
·663 words·4 mins
AI Infrastructure Networking Ethernet MoE Data Centers
Ethernet Evolution: 1G vs 2.5G vs 5G Network Ports Explained
·510 words·3 mins
DataCenter Networking Hardware Ethernet